AIQ Overview

Theme preference system; currently light.

Mem

Memory systems, readers, and writers.

  • 3 studies
  • 6 comparisons
  • 189 original files

Results

All memory comparisons

Complete + bound counts complete answers with source-matched quotes. Each row is a separate test.

Selected comparison ↓
Memory comparison overview
ComparisonComplete + boundResourcesEvidence scale
Readers · fixed-context replay → Luna / DeepSeek Flash 1017
  • DeepSeek Flash 101711/13
  • Luna medium11/13
$0.004811–$0.0193694.54–5.05 s / request13 inputs / profile2 profiles · one pass
Readers · fixed-context replay → Luna reasoning effort
  • Luna low10/13
  • Luna medium11/13
  • Luna none11/13
$0.004149–$0.0047273.63–4.95 s / request13 inputs / profile3 profiles · one pass
Systems · native retrieval → Native memory systems
  • OpenViking11/13
  • RAGFlow rc111/13
$0.006922–$0.024261Time: withheld from comparison13 inputs / profile2 profiles · one pass
Systems · nightly version check → Native memory systems Viewing
  • RAGFlow nightly11/13
Cost not reported4.74 s / request13 inputs / profile1 profile · one pass
Writers · extraction replay → Luna / DeepSeek Flash 1017Quality not measuredDeepSeek Flash 1017 · Luna medium$0.001142–$0.0029144.57–8.31 s / request3 inputs / profile2 profiles · one pass
Writers · extraction replay → Luna reasoning effortQuality not measuredLuna low · Luna medium · Luna none$0.000709–$0.0011203.52–7.72 s / request4 inputs / profile3 profiles · one pass

Separate tests · no combined ranking.

说明

Costs are workload totals in USD; resource ranges span profiles within that row. Quote binding does not establish semantic entailment.

Systems · nightly version check

Native memory systems · RAGFlow nightly version check

↑ All comparisons
Refine comparison

13 inputs / profile · 1 profiles · October 20, 2026

Test method

Answer quality, time and cost

Compare complete, source-bound answers first, then the resources used.

Results & evidence ↓

Complete + bound

Answers · higher is better

  • RAGFlow nightly11/13

Mean time

Seconds / input · lower is better

  • RAGFlow nightly4.74 s

Cost not recorded.

Results and evidence

Sort columns. Open Details for the profile and original record.

Expand a row for all metrics
Sort
October 20 · version check. Values are specific to this test. $0.008500545 is the full new spend for 45 calls, including calibration, fresh embeddings, and the separate Agent probe. It is not a reader-only cost.
Profile versionEvidenceDetails
RAGFlow nightlyv1.0.0-rc2-48-g7eb673bfc11/1311/1328/284.737 s—

One pass · — Not measured.

说明

USD totals are rounded to 6 decimals. The value tooltip and original record retain the recorded precision. Sorting is descriptive.

$0.008500545 is the full new spend for 45 calls, including calibration, fresh embeddings, and the separate Agent probe. It is not a reader-only cost.

Recorded finding

RAGFlow nightly: 11/13 complete + bound. This is a separate version check; the other systems were not rerun.

Protocol and metric definitions

A separate ARM64 nightly run on the retained inputs. Its three native Agent probes are outside the 13-question result.

Synthetic inputs · real provider calls · one pass · no repeated-trial interval.

Complete + bound: complete answer with every quote matched to its supplied source. Complete: complete answers, before quote binding. Quotes: matched / emitted quotes, with a separate denominator. Source binding alone does not establish semantic entailment.

Full conditions and limitations