What delivery mode was still approved for Ivo's Cobalt project immediately after the August 8 meeting?
Result comparison
| Profile | Answer | Quotes source match |
|---|---|---|
| OpenViking | Complete | All quotes bound |
| RAGFlow nightly | Complete | All quotes bound |
| RAGFlow rc1 | Complete | All quotes bound |
Semantic completeness and literal source binding were reviewed separately. Open each observation to inspect its exact returned context.
The question
102 characters · complete saved input
The question
102 characters · complete saved inputWhat delivery mode was still approved for Ivo's Cobalt project immediately after the August 8 meeting?
Outputs and evidence
OpenViking
Complete answer · quotes bound
OpenViking
Complete answer · quotes boundReview
All requested facts and temporal qualifications are correct. Historical mentions explicitly marked as superseded are not treated as current-value errors.
Saved output
Complete saved output · 236 characters
BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery remained in place: Ivo had chosen it for Cobalt, and at the August 8 meeting no change of delivery mode was approved. REPLAY-1-632 was tested as a recovery approach, not approved as a delivery-mode change.
Returned citations · 2
viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/m_eb85892166acc8ef.mdThey chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery.
viking://resources/formal/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53.mdThe team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
Exact evidence supplied to the reader · 11 entries
viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/m_eb85892166acc8ef.md2026-08-01. Ivo started project Cobalt. They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-1-108.
viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/.overview.md--- directory: viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/ source: kind: local uri: /app/.openviking/native/temp/upload/upload_01cf5be1d3384594a19c8291d8c765d5.txt generated_by: component: SemanticProcessor trigger: resource_ingest freshness: total_entries: 1 sampled_entries: 1 unsampled_entries: 0 pending_child_changes: 0 --- # m_eb85892166acc8ef This directory contains a brief informational record about the start of project Cobalt and two configuration choices associated with it. The note states that Ivo started the project on 2026-08-01, with BATCH-1-741 selected for batch delivery and RETRY-1-108 identified as the initial retry policy. It does not explain what the identifiers mean or describe the project, delivery process, or retry behavior in further detail. The material is suitable for readers looking for the recorded date, project name, or configuration identifiers; no intended audience or prerequisite knowledge is specified. ## Directory Coverage There is 1 direct entry, and all entries are represented in the summaries provided. ## Quick Navigation What do you want to learn? - **Find the dated record of the project start** → [m_eb85892166acc8ef.md](viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/m_eb85892166acc8ef.md) - **Look up the stated batch delivery choice** → [m_eb85892166acc8ef.md](viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/m_eb85892166acc8ef.md), which records BATCH-1-741. - **Look up the initial retry policy identifier** → [m_eb85892166acc8ef.md](viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/m_eb85892166acc8ef.md), which records RETRY-1-108. - **Check what context is provided about the project or configuration behavior** → [m_eb85892166acc8ef.md](viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/m_eb85892166acc8ef.md); the note does not provide further explanations of these topics. ## Detailed Description ### [m_eb85892166acc8ef.md](viking://resources/formal/m_eb85892166acc8ef/m_eb85892166acc8ef.md) This file is a short, dated statement about the start of project Cobalt and two associated configuration choices. It records that Ivo started the project on 2026-08-01. In connection with the project, it states that BATCH-1-741 was chosen for batch delivery and that RETRY-1-108 was the initial retry policy. The note does not define either identifier, explain why these choices were selected, or describe how batch delivery or retry behavior works. It also provides no further details about the project beyond the stated start and configuration information. Accordingly, the file serves as a concise record rather than a tutorial, reference guide, or API document. Readers can use it to retrieve the recorded date, the name Cobalt, and the two identifiers associated with batch delivery and the initial retry policy. The summary does not specify an intended audience or prerequisite knowledge. It also does not establish broader context for the project or explain the implications of the configuration choices, so those details should not be inferred from this note.
viking://resources/formal/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53.md2026-08-08. Ivo reported that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
viking://resources/formal/m_c558d1541c4b9d0f/m_c558d1541c4b9d0f.md2026-08-01. Mara started project Larch. They chose BATCH-0-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-0-108.
viking://resources/formal/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53/.overview.md--- directory: viking://resources/formal/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53/ source: kind: local uri: /app/.openviking/native/temp/upload/upload_07358da9e4124ed690805a9b15a09280.txt generated_by: component: SemanticProcessor trigger: resource_ingest freshness: total_entries: 1 sampled_entries: 1 unsampled_entries: 0 pending_child_changes: 0 --- # m_f7ff6441bdd98e53 This directory contains an operational update dated 2026-08-08 about lost updates associated with outages and a tested recovery approach. The note reports that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages and that testing REPLAY-1-632 restored the missing updates. It also records an important decision outcome: no change of delivery mode was approved at the meeting. The directory is useful for readers tracking the reported update loss, the replay-based recovery, and the delivery-mode decision. The identifiers are recorded without further technical explanation. ## Directory Coverage There is **1 direct entry**, and **all entries are represented** in the overview. ## Quick Navigation What do you want to learn? - What update loss was reported and what recovery was tested? → [m_f7ff6441bdd98e53.md](viking://resources/formal/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53.md) - What was decided about changing the delivery mode? → [m_f7ff6441bdd98e53.md](viking://resources/formal/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53.md) ## Detailed Description ### [m_f7ff6441bdd98e53.md](viking://resources/formal/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53/m_f7ff6441bdd98e53.md) This brief operational meeting or incident note records an update dated 2026-08-08. It reports that Ivo identified lost updates in BATCH-1-741 during GATE-1-519 outages. The note then describes a tested recovery approach: REPLAY-1-632 restored the missing updates. It does not provide further technical details about the identifiers, the outage conditions, or how replay was performed. The note also distinguishes the recovery result from a delivery-mode decision. Although replay restored the missing updates, the meeting did not approve a change of delivery mode. Thus, the recorded outcome is that the tested replay approach recovered the missing updates, while the delivery mode remained without an approved change in this meeting note. The document does not state whether a change was considered elsewhere or whether any later decision followed. This file is suited to readers who need a concise record of the reported loss and recovery, or who are checking the stated meeting outcome. Its searchable terms include BATCH-1-741, GATE-1-519, REPLAY-1-632, outages, lost updates, replay, and delivery mode. These terms reflect the subjects named in the note; the note itself does not expand on them with additional system descriptions, implementation guidance, or explanations.
viking://user/formal/memories/events/2026/08/01/project_cobalt_started.md# Summary On 2026-08-01, Ivo started Project Cobalt. # 2026-08-01 (Saturday) ChatLog: **user**: 2026-08-01. Ivo started project Cobalt. They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-1-108.
viking://user/formal/memories/events/2026/08/01/batch_delivery_selected.md# Summary On 2026-08-01, Ivo chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery in Project Cobalt. # 2026-08-01 (Saturday) ChatLog: **user**: 2026-08-01. Ivo started project Cobalt. They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-1-108.
viking://user/formal/memories/events/2026/08/01/.overview.md--- directory: viking://user/formal/memories/events/2026/08/01/ generated_by: component: MemoryUpdater trigger: memory_update freshness: total_entries: 4 sampled_entries: 4 unsampled_entries: 0 pending_child_changes: 0 --- # Events Overview - [On 2026-08-01, Ivo chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery in Project Cobalt.](./batch_delivery_selected.md) - [Mara started project Larch on 2026-08-01, chose BATCH-0-741 for batch delivery, and set RETRY-0-108 as the initial retry policy.](./larch_project_started.md) - [On 2026-08-01, Ivo started Project Cobalt.](./project_cobalt_started.md) - [On 2026-08-01, Ivo set RETRY-1-108 as the initial retry policy for Project Cobalt.](./retry_policy_set.md)
viking://user/formal/memories/events/2026/08/08/delivery_mode_decision.md# Summary On 2026-08-08, no change of delivery mode was approved at the meeting. # 2026-08-08 (Saturday) ChatLog: **user**: 2026-08-08. Ivo reported that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
viking://user/formal/memories/events/2026/08/01/retry_policy_set.md# Summary On 2026-08-01, Ivo set RETRY-1-108 as the initial retry policy for Project Cobalt. # 2026-08-01 (Saturday) ChatLog: **user**: 2026-08-01. Ivo started project Cobalt. They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-1-108.
viking://user/formal/memories/events/2026/08/08/delivery_mode_unchanged.md# Summary At the 2026-08-08 meeting, no change of delivery mode was approved. # 2026-08-08 (Saturday) ChatLog: **user**: 2026-08-08. Mara reported that BATCH-0-741 lost updates during GATE-0-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-0-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
Original files · 3 source records
- answers/openviking-formal-pre-memory-1-2.json2026-10-15-native-kb-memory
File identity
- SHA-256
e526238ef1bd6361fbbbfdfbca7d3ed37df88ad4cbf1b5ac772fc17cd0104c59- Size
- 1,948 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
- contexts/openviking-formal-pre-memory-1-2.json2026-10-15-native-kb-memory
File identity
- SHA-256
ca1cbc5f6b40f363c9ae2b241ec752a4ec9f6ed97d6ce468ef6bfd9f27366f63- Size
- 11,448 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
- review-openviking.json
File identity
- SHA-256
464577c27600ba9c09a15c53d2db0302325319c224a90b0dbf3099da8bc5b72a- Size
- 4,014 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
RAGFlow nightly
Complete answer · quotes bound
RAGFlow nightly
Complete answer · quotes boundReview
Manual review against the frozen sources and cutoff: requested facts, subjects, event dates, approved versus tested changes, and unknown-owner handling are correct.
Saved output
Complete saved output · 182 characters
Batch delivery using BATCH-1-741 remained approved for Ivo’s Cobalt project immediately after the August 8 meeting. REPLAY-1-632 was tested, but no delivery-mode change was approved.
Returned citations · 2
ragflow:document:96a9bf446d8b48ada33eb033c4c8b9f1:chunk:564ca4cb2e88ef8eThey chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery.
ragflow:document:94e70fdbaa2744e188d47078c65371eb:chunk:3699c4c2ca3ec657The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
Exact evidence supplied to the reader · 11 entries
ragflow:document:96a9bf446d8b48ada33eb033c4c8b9f1:chunk:564ca4cb2e88ef8e2026-08-01. Ivo started project Cobalt. They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-1-108.
ragflow:document:94e70fdbaa2744e188d47078c65371eb:chunk:3699c4c2ca3ec6572026-08-08. Ivo reported that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
ragflow:document:cee08b5026d842b99343b723cd632d4a:chunk:695228c0e924112a2026-08-08. Mara reported that BATCH-0-741 lost updates during GATE-0-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-0-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
ragflow:document:1b443da3a73f43e7afe42cd3d8d3142d:chunk:009b12b0d27c81992026-08-01. Mara started project Larch. They chose BATCH-0-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-0-108.
ragflow:document:241d72c8862b4827a65a709370314f5b:chunk:a5b47ef1e40ed473Kestrel-0 approved regional routing table. Columns are region, response window, queue. North | 4 hours | NORTH-0-6a8 South | 12 hours | SOUTH-0-3e5 Rows are independent; do not mix a region with another row.
ragflow:memory:e84293c0415341ab8c66a5e1e2b20dc6:9User Input: 2026-08-08. Ivo reported that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting. Agent Response: Recorded.
ragflow:memory:e84293c0415341ab8c66a5e1e2b20dc6:7User Input: 2026-08-01. Ivo started project Cobalt. They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-1-108. Agent Response: Recorded.
ragflow:memory:e84293c0415341ab8c66a5e1e2b20dc6:5User Input: 2026-08-08. Mara reported that BATCH-0-741 lost updates during GATE-0-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-0-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting. Agent Response: Recorded.
ragflow:memory:e84293c0415341ab8c66a5e1e2b20dc6:3User Input: 2026-08-01. Mara started project Larch. They chose BATCH-0-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-0-108. Agent Response: Recorded.
ragflow:memory:e84293c0415341ab8c66a5e1e2b20dc6:6On 2026-08-08, Mara reported that BATCH-0-741 lost updates during GATE-0-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-0-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at the meeting.
ragflow:memory:e84293c0415341ab8c66a5e1e2b20dc6:10On 2026-08-08, Ivo reported that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. The meeting did not approve a change of delivery mode.
Original files · 3 source records
- answers/ragflow-formal-pre-memory-1-2.jsonragflow-nightly-20261020
File identity
- SHA-256
a3e8ce0d107873197d836bc70643f4d1b79d8e6ea583514fd38627ca769a49e4- Size
- 1,917 bytes
- Source
- Preserved local report
- contexts/ragflow-formal-pre-memory-1-2.jsonragflow-nightly-20261020
File identity
- SHA-256
e0c3f2f02988e7d879035b43e14c0dfe4f08332179a022afb4e6ccb785175586- Size
- 5,405 bytes
- Source
- Preserved local report
- review-ragflow.json
File identity
- SHA-256
e534e2722830d8f167c8a58e2209cf69d78eb8ebf12c27ab993d558becfec7cc- Size
- 3,893 bytes
- Source
- Preserved local report
RAGFlow rc1
Complete answer · quotes bound
RAGFlow rc1
Complete answer · quotes boundReview
All requested facts are correct for the subject and time in the question. Unknown-owner cases correctly state that no owner was appointed.
Saved output
Complete saved output · 111 characters
BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery remained approved; no delivery-mode change was approved at the August 8 meeting.
Returned citations · 2
ragflow:document:60c7b04dd9a54820b17be95530bb5bda:chunk:814df48295aa88f7They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery.
ragflow:document:984a41009bde4f3d83d2447f0b92191b:chunk:e9c52ba58c534573No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
Exact evidence supplied to the reader · 11 entries
ragflow:document:60c7b04dd9a54820b17be95530bb5bda:chunk:814df48295aa88f72026-08-01. Ivo started project Cobalt. They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-1-108.
ragflow:document:984a41009bde4f3d83d2447f0b92191b:chunk:e9c52ba58c5345732026-08-08. Ivo reported that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
ragflow:document:95244f4933ba4a2bb8c270eecf201f4a:chunk:422cd16eee930caa2026-08-08. Mara reported that BATCH-0-741 lost updates during GATE-0-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-0-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting.
ragflow:document:1f8934b0b894451dbb5d157df1eeac46:chunk:91cba475d750a4e82026-08-01. Mara started project Larch. They chose BATCH-0-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-0-108.
ragflow:document:3c24f970a9124622a9820e38febee2fd:chunk:7ff75b3fe7ceadedKestrel-0 approved regional routing table. Columns are region, response window, queue. North | 4 hours | NORTH-0-6a8 South | 12 hours | SOUTH-0-3e5 Rows are independent do not mix a region with another row.
ragflow:memory:a14659ca2f114db9b1b8c1707f3bbb35:13User Input: 2026-08-08. Ivo reported that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting. Agent Response: Recorded.
ragflow:memory:a14659ca2f114db9b1b8c1707f3bbb35:9User Input: 2026-08-01. Ivo started project Cobalt. They chose BATCH-1-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-1-108. Agent Response: Recorded.
ragflow:memory:a14659ca2f114db9b1b8c1707f3bbb35:7User Input: 2026-08-08. Mara reported that BATCH-0-741 lost updates during GATE-0-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-0-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at this meeting. Agent Response: Recorded.
ragflow:memory:a14659ca2f114db9b1b8c1707f3bbb35:5User Input: 2026-08-01. Mara started project Larch. They chose BATCH-0-741 for batch delivery. The initial retry policy was RETRY-0-108. Agent Response: Recorded.
ragflow:memory:a14659ca2f114db9b1b8c1707f3bbb35:14At a meeting, Ivo reported that BATCH-1-741 lost updates during GATE-1-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-1-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved.
ragflow:memory:a14659ca2f114db9b1b8c1707f3bbb35:8On 2026-08-08, Mara reported that BATCH-0-741 lost updates during GATE-0-519 outages. The team tested REPLAY-0-632, which restored the missing updates. No change of delivery mode was approved at the meeting.
Original files · 3 source records
- answers/ragflow-formal-pre-memory-1-2.json2026-10-15-native-kb-memory
File identity
- SHA-256
5748530c0013e5235f70bdfd27ec6336a3557556f2d5ba83b8d4ce9f4696e053- Size
- 1,782 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
- contexts/ragflow-formal-pre-memory-1-2.json2026-10-15-native-kb-memory
File identity
- SHA-256
260b4c0063c5497410dc5bb3b9c56ae4eec116161118149ce667a7d2cc8b3bcc- Size
- 5,393 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
- review-ragflow.json
File identity
- SHA-256
4f625457ff88b18ee63be1ad46d6ce6800a6b3b2bb5c1efe38ba8a11d69544f7- Size
- 3,540 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
Protocol and expected facts
Original files, case ID, and interpretation limits
Protocol and expected facts
Original files, case ID, and interpretation limitsCase ID: pre-memory-1-2
- formal-method.json
File identity
- SHA-256
3ac852a890c33d6c3fce6b6c9e3e64054bab95e1846865ef5f2a819c4d12fa29- Size
- 3,011 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
- oracle.json
File identity
- SHA-256
8ac3caf4055989d319ef143eb1fad280d3372c6c85113bbd639498fdc7871644- Size
- 2,788 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
- protocol.json2026-10-15-native-kb-memory
File identity
- SHA-256
d41e926e2ce76880b33d9e301ee3239bfe4c9b6d5bec4e0b1eed88b5935c3d6d- Size
- 1,414 bytes
- Source
- Frozen source ↗
- protocol.jsonragflow-nightly-20261020
File identity
- SHA-256
3cef6fb01be1004e3286c474519c5ae640c6d92c55bca0f8c95a19817aaed6b4- Size
- 1,798 bytes
- Source
- Preserved local report
A matching quote establishes a literal binding. Semantic support and subject correctness require separate review. Historical outputs remain unchanged.