AIQ Overview

Theme preference system; currently light.

Luna reasoning effort · writer · Independent research

Retain the project and effective date in each memory

Result comparison

Saved outcomes for this case. Rows are separate observations, not an aggregate score.
Profile Output Quality
Luna lowSavedNot scored
Luna mediumSavedNot scored
Luna noneSavedNot scored

An extraction replay only. Native storage, reconciliation, retrieval, and Agent use were not rerun. More atoms do not establish better memory.

Saved outputs and resource use do not establish a semantic quality ranking.

The extraction input

377 characters · complete saved input

**CONVERSATION:** User Input: 2026-08-22. Mara reviewed Larch. Keep the August 15 delivery choice. For the next outage, use the recovery procedure validated on August 8. The retry policy is now RETRY-0-907, superseding RETRY-0-108. No budget owner has been appointed. Agent Response: Recorded. **CONVERSATION TIME:** 2026-10-20 14:54:14 **CURRENT TIME:** 2026-10-20 14:54:14

Outputs and evidence

Luna low

Saved output · quality not scored
Semantic completeness: Not scoredLiteral quote binding: Not applicable

Review

All profiles retain the aggregate review, retry, recovery, and unappointed-owner facts, but several independent atoms omit Larch and use capture or referenced-event time. Low additionally dates the keep-delivery instruction to October 20 instead of the August 22 event.

Saved output

Original JSON · 854 characters
{
  "episodic": [
    {
      "content": "On August 22, 2026, Mara reviewed Larch.",
      "valid_at": "2026-08-22T00:00:00",
      "invalid_at": ""
    },
    {
      "content": "On October 20, 2026, the user instructed that the August 15 delivery choice be kept.",
      "valid_at": "2026-10-20T14:54:14",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ],
  "procedural": [
    {
      "content": "For the next outage, use the recovery procedure validated on August 8, 2026.",
      "valid_at": "2026-08-08T00:00:00",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ],
  "semantic": [
    {
      "content": "The current retry policy is RETRY-0-907, superseding RETRY-0-108.",
      "valid_at": "2026-10-20T14:54:14",
      "invalid_at": ""
    },
    {
      "content": "No budget owner has been appointed.",
      "valid_at": "2026-10-20T14:54:14",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ]
}
Original files · 3 source records
  • cases.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    ff799b7945d0d1df7c9a5ca7c628f460e7a70a59520a4b6f3fa9378a6e6b5c68
    Size
    241,477 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report
  • low-writer-larch-retention.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    6c3461df28c9124dc7c7df954fe7fa3f39e4cf68e4ee995ae89d2872e48b65ec
    Size
    2,714 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report
  • writer-review.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    3b50fb348a44915ad7a9562e1f5dd765b88d6b351d598a90ec956cb4592fc065
    Size
    4,852 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report

Luna medium

Saved output · quality not scored
Semantic completeness: Not scoredLiteral quote binding: Not applicable

Review

All profiles retain the aggregate review, retry, recovery, and unappointed-owner facts, but several independent atoms omit Larch and use capture or referenced-event time. Low additionally dates the keep-delivery instruction to October 20 instead of the August 22 event.

Saved output

Original JSON · 745 characters
{
  "episodic": [
    {
      "content": "Mara reviewed Larch.",
      "valid_at": "2026-08-22",
      "invalid_at": ""
    },
    {
      "content": "The August 15 delivery choice was to be kept.",
      "valid_at": "2026-08-15",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ],
  "procedural": [
    {
      "content": "For the next outage, use the recovery procedure validated on August 8.",
      "valid_at": "2026-08-08",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ],
  "semantic": [
    {
      "content": "Retry policy RETRY-0-907 supersedes RETRY-0-108.",
      "valid_at": "2026-10-20T14:54:14",
      "invalid_at": ""
    },
    {
      "content": "No budget owner had been appointed.",
      "valid_at": "2026-10-20T14:54:14",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ]
}
Original files · 3 source records
  • cases.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    ff799b7945d0d1df7c9a5ca7c628f460e7a70a59520a4b6f3fa9378a6e6b5c68
    Size
    241,477 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report
  • medium-writer-larch-retention.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    1a6fb6907c15cd948da4c794435d47e873f06c23ad1869a680922ddaf319bf29
    Size
    2,502 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report
  • writer-review.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    3b50fb348a44915ad7a9562e1f5dd765b88d6b351d598a90ec956cb4592fc065
    Size
    4,852 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report

Luna none

Saved output · quality not scored
Semantic completeness: Not scoredLiteral quote binding: Not applicable

Review

All profiles retain the aggregate review, retry, recovery, and unappointed-owner facts, but several independent atoms omit Larch and use capture or referenced-event time. Low additionally dates the keep-delivery instruction to October 20 instead of the August 22 event.

Saved output

Original JSON · 842 characters
{
  "episodic": [
    {
      "content": "On 2026-08-22, Mara reviewed Larch.",
      "valid_at": "2026-08-22T00:00:00",
      "invalid_at": ""
    },
    {
      "content": "On 2026-08-22, the user instructed that the August 15 delivery choice be kept.",
      "valid_at": "2026-08-22T00:00:00",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ],
  "procedural": [
    {
      "content": "For the next outage, use the recovery procedure validated on August 8.",
      "valid_at": "2026-08-08T00:00:00",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ],
  "semantic": [
    {
      "content": "The current retry policy is RETRY-0-907, which supersedes RETRY-0-108.",
      "valid_at": "2026-10-20T14:54:14",
      "invalid_at": ""
    },
    {
      "content": "No budget owner has been appointed.",
      "valid_at": "2026-10-20T14:54:14",
      "invalid_at": ""
    }
  ]
}
Original files · 3 source records
  • cases.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    ff799b7945d0d1df7c9a5ca7c628f460e7a70a59520a4b6f3fa9378a6e6b5c68
    Size
    241,477 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report
  • none-writer-larch-retention.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    9a42f3d6f2522550b09d881428737bfc6c3047da80a87fd8be03f0958afa0477
    Size
    2,687 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report
  • writer-review.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    3b50fb348a44915ad7a9562e1f5dd765b88d6b351d598a90ec956cb4592fc065
    Size
    4,852 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report

Protocol and expected facts

Original files, case ID, and interpretation limits

Case ID: writer-larch-retention

  • cases.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    ff799b7945d0d1df7c9a5ca7c628f460e7a70a59520a4b6f3fa9378a6e6b5c68
    Size
    241,477 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report
  • oracle.json
    File identity
    SHA-256
    8ac3caf4055989d319ef143eb1fad280d3372c6c85113bbd639498fdc7871644
    Size
    2,788 bytes
    Source
    Preserved local report

A matching quote establishes a literal binding. Semantic support and subject correctness require separate review. Historical outputs remain unchanged.